How Kmart made ‘cheap’ cool

K-Mart_Article_Expand_1150x550_01_AWe’ve all done it before – walked into Kmart to buy some batteries and walk out 45 minutes later with a variety of fake indoor plants in concrete pots and copper coloured wire baskets. Kmart’s transformation to Australia’s leading department store and market darling under the leadership of Guy Russo, has been nothing short of remarkable. In just under 10 years, Kmart has gone from the brink of bankruptcy to $470m EBIT in 2016. More importantly, Kmart has reimagined the concept of “cheap” to now be fashionable, on-trend merchandise, desired by an even wider customer population than it previously targeted.

A tall poppy in a struggling market

Department store retailing in Australia is a struggling market. Competition from online retailers offering a wider selection and competitive pricing has meant that some of the largest players, Target, Big W and Myer have been going backwards – in the case of Big W and Target, the downward spiral shows no improvement. Kmart, on the other hand has gone from strength to strength and over the last eight years has averaged a staggering compound growth rate (CAGR) of 120 per cent. So how did they do it?

Chart 1: Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) (A$m)

Kmart graph


Rebranding ‘cheap’

Underpinning Kmart’s transformation has been an overhaul of it’s branding and customer proposition. Importantly, a re-brand is not simply a logo or a catchy new phrase – as Kmart have shown – a rebrand must drive organisational wide changes to be truly effective.

It started with Kmart aiming for a proposition that would make it’s customers feel pride rather than wearing the burden of having to shop at a discount store due to a lack of means. Sounds simple enough, but this proposition not only re-branded Kmart, but it also re-branded to concept of ‘buying cheap’. They removed any sort of taboo associated with shopping in a store with low prices.

From here, this new customer proposition needed support from four areas in the business to realise the change:

  • Pricing: Kmart moved from being a ‘discount store’ to being Everyday Low Prices (EDLP). A nuanced change, but it was critical in changing customer perceptions of Kmart. Now Kmart has an average single sale price of only $7 and you will be hard-pressed to find an item stocked that’s priced more than $10.
  • Sourcing and Stock: However implementing an EDLP pricing strategy without hurting profitability requires looking at your sourcing model and stock levels. Kmart transitioned to a direct sourcing model and empowered buyers to seek out on-trend merchandise direct from suppliers. Kmart’s razor-like focus on what customers want and matching this with enticing prices, has created a legion of #kmartlover fans who simply cannot leave Kmart without getting the latest home interior item. Further better products didn’t necessarily mean more of it – Kmart’s instore selection also dropped from 120,000 products to just 50,000.
  • In Store Experience: Aisles were then cleaned up, widened and bargain bins removed. Now when you enter a Kmart, what first strikes you is how light, logical and neat it is. Compare this with a Target store, which you’ll often find has untidy bins of miscellaneous products scattered in the middle of aisles and low cost items seeming sporadically placed next to ‘Danni Minogue’ Petite higher priced items.
  • Logistics: To have an average single sale price of only $7, the supply chain needed to support higher volumes. So Kmart introduced a lean methodology in its processes including picking and packing with smaller carton sizes to lower shipping costs.

Now it’s Big W and Targets turn – but can they do it?

So if a re-brand of Kmart worked, why can’t Target and Big W just do the same thing? It’s possible that Target and Big W are acting on the re-brand without the clear customer proposition and operational excellence within the business that is needed to support this. For example, Big W’s latest TV ads focus on the company’s fashion selection and low prices (following a similar look to Kmart) – however instore it’s difficult not to be bewildered by the fact that you can purchase a $6 t-shirt and up to a $700 Dyson vacuum cleaner. This sort of price spread automatically indicates to a lay shopper that sourcing might not be as competitive as it could be, thus this product might not be as cheap as it could be.

Both Big W and Target are dwindling in with negative EBIT in the last financial year – exactly where Kmart was in 2008. Their primary focus will no doubt be about remaining profitable. From there only will things like rebranding and operational excellence be considered. It will be interesting to watch Kmart’s next move – whether its existing model and brand loyalty can sustain the growth the business and investors are used to.

Arani Satgunaseelan is a principal consultant at ADP & Co, a management consultancy specialising in strategy and analytics for the retail sector. Arani can be contacted at

Access exclusive analysis, locked news and reports with Inside Retail Weekly. Subscribe today and get our premium print publication delivered to your door every week.



  1. Catherine posted on March 30, 2017

    The only way forward for Target is to separate its identity from KMart and take it to a higher level. For 2-3 years this was happening, with exciting collaborations (Missoni, Gaultier) and cafes, creches, refurbishments. Target became an enjoyable experience again. Then the new Russo management stepped in a year ago and scotched all that progress - since when it has crashed and burned with disastrous results! His strategy may have worked with Kmart but then, all those years ago, KMart was like a ripe plum ready to be picked. The Australian customer was ready and waiting for cheap end fashion and it was a void easily filled. By his own admission, Russo has no "Plan B" for Target and clearly doesn't know what to do, other than drag it back down and convert the outlets by stealth, into more and more Kmarts. Sorry, but we've been there, done that, we've got the T-shirts - too many of them!

  2. Lisa posted on February 11, 2019

    in 2019 I think Kmart is now trashy and sells only rubbish. A few years ago it used to be what is described here. Due to disability I have not really shopped at Kmart for the last 2 years as the only Kmart store within a shopping centre has been renovated as part of the whole shopping centre expansion and refit, and so I was not able to access a Kmart due to the lack of seating and the terrible set-out and stupid staff who have no idea about customer service or discrimination laws. The renovated store has just reopened and I was surprised to see my favourite store selling nothing but garbage. with products so obviously cheap and nasty and with really inferior quality and choice of products with insipid colours. I used to be able to buy shoes that fir my awkwardly wide feet and was able to get some great clothes. Same with Target. Now Target has some good items, particularly workwear and pet section, but Kmart has nothing worth buying. Aisle often have trolleys in them with stock still on them or staff with the trolleys again blocking access to aisles. I have also found that they layout is really bad. so hard to find anything with similar items scattered over various places and some up way too high and I am tall (to the point of breaching WHS for customers and staff). Looking for picture frames for Christmas and all they had were very basic plain coloured frames, all identical, just black, white or bleached wood. No variety at all. No longer a fan and no longer shopping there.

Comment Manually


Executive coach Leora Givoni shares 13 tips for better crisis communication, including why it's ok to be vulnerable…

15 hours ago

Bricks-and-mortar stores are back, but it's not quite business as usual. Here's how Hush Puppies, Sheike, Honey Bir…

2 days ago

Companies and their officers have been given a temporary reprieve from their continuous disclosure obligations. Bus…

2 days ago