NRA takes stand on leasing laws

Contract paper holeThe National Retail Association is demanding action on the concept of uniform national shop leasing laws, and says business owners are tired of inquiries into shop leasing arrangements that go nowhere.

Trevor Evans, NRA CEO, and Michael Lonie, retail leasing specialist, will give evidence to the Senate Standing Committee on Economics in Canberra, as part of the committee’s inquiry into the need for a national approach to retail leasing arrangements.

Evans says the NRA strongly support a uniform national approach to shop leasing, saying the current arrangements, which vary from state to state, are creating confusion and adding an unnecessary cost and regulatory burden to retailers.

Issues to be addressed on a national level include the first right of refusal for tenants to renew their lease, better dispute resolution processes, fairer rent adjustment procedures, requirements around bank guarantees, transparency around incentives, and contractual obligations around store refits.

Evans says retailers have become cynical about inquiries into the subject that produced hefty reports and very little action.

“The NRA certainly supports a national approach to retail leasing arrangements to create a fairer system and reduce the burden on small to medium businesses, while also benefiting landlords.

“There’s no secret to this position.  It’s the same position we gave to the Productivity Commission inquiry on this subject in 2008, and again in 2014 when it examined the retail industry.

“It’s the same position we have given to a number of state based reviews of retail leasing as well.  At some point retailers are entitled to ask ‘how many inquiries are needed before something will be done?’.

“We commend the Senate Committee for its interest in the subject, but we urge them to keep up political pressure and make sure Federal and State Governments act on their recommendations.”

Comments

2 comments

  1. John posted on February 16, 2015

    They would be redundant if there weren't so many enquiries. Bureaucrats need to shuffle papers time and time again, pretending they do something meaningful and positive. Same thing goes on on every level of government. The sad thing is they make us pay for it all. What a waste!

    • Michael Ratner posted on February 16, 2015

      Couldn't agree more. Another inquiry. I've been part of these inquiries for 30 years.Invert the pyramid. Stop asking questions about what was and find out first what it should be. Get the parties to agree (ha ha) on what they would consider win-win. Take all forms of blackmail out of the discussions and appoint people who have a clue what is going on instead of listening to people pedaling their own agendas.

Comment Manually